首页 英文研究报告文章正文

【英文】波音737MAX空难调查报告(246页)

英文研究报告 2020-09-21 1 管理员

Aside from the concerns raised by Boeing engineers about the impact of faulty AOA data on  MCAS and the ability of MAX pilots to be able to counteract repetitive MCAS activation, Boeing  also had evidence from its own test results showing that a test pilot took more than 10 seconds to  respond to uncommanded MCAS activation, a condition the pilot found to be “catastrophic[.]” In  the event that MCAS activated unexpectedly Boeing assumed that such a situation would look and feel to pilots like a condition known as runaway stabilizer trim—a condition that involves the  electric trim motor suddenly moving the horizontal stabilizer toward the full nose-up or nose-down  stop. Stabilizer trim runaway is well known to pilots, and FAA guidance presumes pilots will  recognize the condition and complete the procedure to counteract it within four seconds.. 659 But  stabilizer trim runaway does not provoke the multitude of simultaneous and seemingly unrelated  cautions and warnings that accompany erroneous MCAS activation when triggered by a failure of an  AOA sensor.660 Yet, Boeing assumed that pilots would respond to an unexpected MCAS activation  as it if were a runaway stabilizer trim event, within four seconds.

The NTSB report also found: “While Boeing considered the possibility of uncommanded  MCAS operation as part of its functional hazard assessment, it did not evaluate all the potential  alerts and indications that could accompany a failure that also resulted in uncommanded MCAS  operation. Therefore, neither Boeing’s system safety assessment nor its simulator tests evaluated  how the combined effect of alerts and indications might impact pilots’ recognition of which  procedure(s) to prioritize in responding to an unintended MCAS operation caused by an erroneous  AOA input.”667 NTSB pointed out that according to Federal regulations under 14 CFR  25.1309(d)(4), “compliance demonstration as part of aircraft certification must include analysis that  considers the crew warning cues, corrective action required, and the capability of detecting faults.

【英文】波音737MAX空难调查报告(246页)

文件下载
资源名称:【英文】波音737MAX空难调查报告(246页)


标签: ENGLISH REPORTS

站点地图   关于我们   意见反馈   免责声明     京ICP备12009579号

分享:

支付宝

微信