【英文】美国智库报告：美国大学如何支持中国的军事工业（68页）

The relationships between U.S. universities and  problematic Chinese entities are often characterized  as partnerships. However, little is known about these  arrangements beyond the information provided  in press releases, on university websites, or on the  internet landing pages associated with shuttered CIs.  Also unclear is why NISP-vetted U.S. universities  conducting classifed research for the U.S. government  are permitted to maintain academic and research  partnerships with problematic Chinese entities.  Remarkably, U.S. universities are under no legal or  regulatory obligation to disclose the details of their  partnerships.

The academic relationships  that persist after the closure of a CI take one of three  forms. In the frst, the U.S. university expresses its  desire to maintain a “partnership” with its Chinese  sister university after the CI closure. In some cases, this  partnership involves incorporating CI programming  into existing university initiatives. In the second type,  upon closing its CI, the U.S. university formally  establishes a new institute devoted to China or related  international issues. Te U.S. university typically  establishes this new initiative with its former sister  university. In the third type, the U.S. university  announces its CI’s closure but does not specifcally  mention its plans to maintain academic or research  relationships with the Chinese sister university that  supported the CI’s programming.