【英文】美国智库报告：美国大学如何支持中国的军事工业（68页）

英文研究报告 2021年12月27日 11:40 管理员

The relationships between U.S. universities and problematic Chinese entities are often characterized as partnerships. However, little is known about these arrangements beyond the information provided in press releases, on university websites, or on the internet landing pages associated with shuttered CIs. Also unclear is why NISP-vetted U.S. universities conducting classifed research for the U.S. government are permitted to maintain academic and research partnerships with problematic Chinese entities. Remarkably, U.S. universities are under no legal or regulatory obligation to disclose the details of their partnerships.

The academic relationships that persist after the closure of a CI take one of three forms. In the frst, the U.S. university expresses its desire to maintain a “partnership” with its Chinese sister university after the CI closure. In some cases, this partnership involves incorporating CI programming into existing university initiatives. In the second type, upon closing its CI, the U.S. university formally establishes a new institute devoted to China or related international issues. Te U.S. university typically establishes this new initiative with its former sister university. In the third type, the U.S. university announces its CI’s closure but does not specifcally mention its plans to maintain academic or research relationships with the Chinese sister university that supported the CI’s programming.