China’s financing and investment spread across 61 BRI countries in 2023 (up...
2024-02-27 31 英文报告下载
When it comes to the defense budget, how much we spend does not automatically determine the U.S. military’s posture or capacity. As a matter of fact, simply looking at how much is allocated to defense does not tell us much about the capacity, modernity, or readiness of the forces. Proper funding is a necessary condition for a capable, modern, and ready force, but it is not sufcient by itself. A larger defense budget, for example, could be associated with less military capability if the money were allocated inappropriately or spent wastefully. Nevertheless, the budget does reflflect the importance assigned to defending the nation and its interests in prioritizing federal spending. Absent a signifificant threat to the country’s survival, the U.S. government will always balance spending on defense against spending in all of the other areas of government activity that are deemed necessary or desirable. Ideally, defense requirements are determined by identifying national interests that might need to be protected with military power; assessing the nature of threats to those interests, what would be needed to defeat those threats, and the costs associated with that capability; and then determining what the country can aford or is willing to spend. Any diference between assessed requirements and afordable levels of spending on defense would constitute a risk to U.S. security interests.
This Index enthusiastically adopts this approach: interests, threats, requirements, resulting force, and associated budget. Spending less than the amount needed to maintain a two-MRC force results in policy debates about where to accept risk: force modernization, the capacity to conduct large-scale or multiple simultaneous operations, or force readiness. The composition of the force and the understanding of military risk have become more salient issues with the shift toward competition with China and Russia. Both the 2017 National Security Strategy10 and the 2021 Interim National Security Guidance11 recognize that meeting the challenges posed by these two large, well-equipped, and well-resourced countries requires a U.S. force that is modern, ready, and efective in all domains of warfare. The decision to fund national defense at a level that is commensurate with interests and prevailing threats reflflects our national priorities and risk tolerance. This Index assesses the ability of the nation’s military forces to protect vital national security interests within the world as it is so that the debate about the level of funding for hard power is better informed. The fifiscal year (FY) 2021 base discretionary budget for the Department of Defense was $703.7 billion.12 This represents the resources allocated to pay for the forces (manpower, equipment, and training); enabling capabilities (things like transportation, satellites, defense intelligence, and research and development); and institutional support (bases and stations, facilities, recruiting, and the like). The base budget has not paid for the cost of major ongoing overseas operations, which are captured in supplemental funding known as OCO (overseas contingency operations).
标签: 英文报告下载
相关文章
China’s financing and investment spread across 61 BRI countries in 2023 (up...
2024-02-27 31 英文报告下载
Though the risk of AI leading to catastrophe or human extinction had...
2024-02-26 51 英文报告下载
Focusing on the prospects for 2024, global growth is likely to come i...
2024-02-21 96 英文报告下载
Economic activity declined slightly on average, employment was roughly flat...
2024-02-07 67 英文报告下载
Economic growth can be defned as an increase in the quantity or quali...
2024-02-06 82 英文报告下载
In this initial quarterly survey, 41% of leaders reported their organizatio...
2024-02-05 66 英文报告下载
最新留言