首页 英文研究报告文章正文

【英文】威尔逊中心报告:2021-22中美政策总结报告(383页)

英文研究报告 2022年08月29日 07:53 管理员

If respondents are sensitive to these signals, we should expect them to shif  preferences in-line with the treatment they were shown. As Table 5 summarizes, however, we see little indication that respondents are internalizing such  signals to update their perceptions of the underlying rivalry. In no instance is  there any indication that the randomly assigned rhetoric treatment has any  measurable impact on respondents’ qualitative assessments of rivalry, nor does  there appear to be any impact on overall hawkishness. Taken together, the  fndings suggest that respondent sentiments are relatively stable and not particularly sensitive to domestic framing. Again, this fnding stands in contrast  to conventional interpretations of Chinese public opinion on foreign policy as  being pliant and politicized.In addition to domestic factors, Chinese citizens presumably form some of  their attitudes toward the United States in response to policy and rhetoric  coming out of Washington D.C. 

In particular, the popular victimization  frame suggests that respondents might feel under threat from or that they  are being unfairly treated by the United States. It has, for instance, become  commonplace for Chinese diplomats to aggressively protest and deny external  criticism of China—especially when it concerns issues that considered to be of  internal concern, such as human rights or ethnic policy. In other words, hawkishness in Chinese public opinion might operate in part as a reactionary and  emotional response to external criticism. By the same token, we might expect  that praise for China’s achievements, in addition to criticism, might endear  citizens in a more positive direction. To explore these emotional factors, I embedded an experiment in both  waves of the survey whereby respondents were primed with one of three statements attributed to western governments indicating criticism, either over  China’s perceived economic opportunism and human rights abuses, or praise for  developmental achievements, and then asked to write down some of their feelings in response to the statements.

【英文】威尔逊中心报告:2021-22中美政策总结报告(383页)

文件下载
资源名称:【英文】威尔逊中心报告:2021-22中美政策总结报告(383页)


标签: 英文报告下载

并购家 关于我们   意见反馈   免责声明 网站地图 京ICP备12009579号-9

分享

复制链接

ipoipocn@163.com

发送邮件
电子邮件为本站唯一联系方式